article · International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research
The development of pedagogical reasoning is a critical component of preparing preservice teachers, particularly within South Africa's diverse and socially complex educational landscape. Classrooms are characterised by learners from varied cultural, socio-economic, and linguistic backgrounds, requiring teachers to adapt their pedagogical practices to foster inclusive and socially just learning environments. Without explicit emphasis in initial teacher education, limited pedagogical reasoning can constrain effective teaching and learning. Guided by the Minimum Requirements for Teacher Education Qualifications policy, which underpins teacher preparation in South African higher education, this study employs a critical conceptual analysis grounded in the Capability Approach. A systematic synthesis of literature on pedagogical reasoning, teacher education, and education policy is undertaken to interrogate how pedagogical reasoning is conceptualised and enacted in preservice teacher education. The conceptual analysis, based on a desktop review, indicates that pedagogical reasoning practices informed by contextual sensitivity, adaptive decision-making, and reflective engagement are central to supporting equitable teaching. These dimensions enable preservice teachers to respond meaningfully to learner diversity while aligning pedagogical choices with ethical and social imperatives. The findings suggest that embedding ethically grounded and socially responsive pedagogical reasoning within teacher education programmes can strengthen preservice teachers' capacity to promote inclusion and social justice in classrooms. The study contributes to ongoing debates on teacher educational design and policy by offering conceptual insights that support the development of more responsive and effective preservice teacher training models in South Africa.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.26803/ijlter.25.3.35
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.