MARATTO

article · Labour & Industry a journal of the social and economic relations of work

Human–AI collaboration and decent work outcomes in SMEs: the mediating role of perceived algorithmic fairness

Abstract

SMEs have been criticised for failing to offer decent work. However, research on AI and decent work has been conducted mainly in large firms. This research aimed to contribute to the body of knowledge by investigating the mediating role of perceived algorithmic fairness in the effects of human–AI collaboration on decent work outcomes in SMEs. The research surveyed 318 SME owners, managers, and employees. The results show that perceived algorithmic fairness mediates the impact of human–AI collaboration on decent work outcomes in SMEs. The study recommends that SMEs reduce algorithmic bias and enhance perceived algorithmic fairness by improving decent work outcomes through human–AI collaboration.

Research topics

  • Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • AI and HR Technologies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1080/10301763.2026.2726038

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.