article · Ain Shams Dental Journal
Background: For the patient seeking correction, gingival hyperpigmentation may be a major concern, particularly in cases of vertical maxillary excess, high lip line, and strong aesthetic demand.Objective: to assess if ceramic soft tissue trimming bur equally efficient as a gingival depigmentation tool versus diode laser.Materials and Methods: A total of 30 patients who needed depigmentation procedures in upper jaw . In this study we used split mouth design by dividing the upper jaws into 2 equal half. In Group 1, The soft tissue trimming bur performed the depigmentation treatment. The depigmentation process in Group 2 was completed using a laser.Results: Group I showed a significant difference at follow-up visits (p<0.001). Value recorded at 1 month (100.00±0.00) had the greatest mean value then 7 days (82.43±8.42) while value recorded at baseline (0.00±0.00) showed the least mean value. Pairwise assessments showed significantly different values (p<0.001). Group II had a significant variation at follow-up then 7 days (82.94±8.02) while at baseline (0.00±0.00) showed the least mean value. Pairwise comparisons showed significantly different values at different intervals (p<0.001).Conclusion: The outcomes of the two methods of treatment were nearly identical. A Aesthetic satisfaction and equitable wound healing. Compared to diode lasers, soft tissue trimmers are less expensive and easier to operate.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.21608/asdj.2024.274669.1223
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.