MARATTO

article · African Journal of Emergency Medicine

Who is the emergency care community? A qualitative exploration of stakeholder roles and relationships in engaged research within a South African provincial emergency care system

Abstract

This study highlights the complexity of defining the EC community, with boundaries that are broad, variable, and often contested. Participants identified the absence or unclear roles of key stakeholders, including patients, decision-makers, and frontline clinicians, within research processes. Fragmentation and limited trust were viewed as major barriers to meaningful engagement, reinforcing the need for stronger, more transparent relationships within the community. Frontline clinicians were consistently recognised as underutilised yet uniquely positioned to connect clinical realities with academic research and community priorities. Strengthening engaged research in this context will require clearer guidance on how and when to involve stakeholders, structured mechanisms to build and sustain trust, and practical support for clinician participation. Together, these steps could help embed engagement more deeply into research culture and enhance the relevance and impact of EC scholarship.

Research topics

  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.afjem.2026.100950

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.