article · Journal of Biomedicine and Biosensors.
Wearable technologies now permit near-continuous measurement of physiological and behavioral parameters under free-living conditions. Combined with advances in artificial intelligence (AI), these devices support the development of wearable-derived digital biomarkers that may shift healthcare from a reactive to a preventive and personalized model. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the technological foundations, AI-based signal processing, clinical applications, implementation challenges, and future directions of wearable-derived digital biomarkers. Evidence supports their use across cardiovascular disease, diabetes and obesity, neurological and mental health conditions, sleep and respiratory medicine, and remote patient monitoring, where continuous data streams can inform early detection, individualized risk prediction, treatment optimization, and clinical decision-making. We propose a conceptual framework describing how wearable sensing, continuous physiological data acquisition, and AI-based analytics translate into clinically actionable digital biomarkers. At the same time, we argue that enthusiasm has outpaced evidence: few candidate biomarkers have undergone prospective validation in diverse populations, analytical performance varies substantially across devices and skin tones, and demonstration of improved clinical outcomes remains rare. Data quality, validation, standardization, interoperability, algorithm transparency, privacy, cybersecurity, regulatory oversight, and equitable access all constrain clinical adoption. Emerging developments in explainable AI, multimodal data integration, digital twins, and predictive analytics may address some of these constraints. Wearable-derived digital biomarkers hold genuine potential for proactive, patient-centered, data-driven care, but realizing that potential will depend less on new sensors than on rigorous validation, standardization, and equitable implementation.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.58613/jbb633
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.