MARATTO

article · Egyptian Journal of Physical Therapy

Validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Back Pain Function Scale in patients with low back pain

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported questionnaires offer valuable tools that can be used in clinics and research to determine the effectiveness of treatment. The aim of this research was the translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Back Pain Functional Scale (BPFS) into Arabic. Methods: According to standardized guidelines, the translation and adaptation of the scale was completed. Two panels of experts were asked to review the instrument for consistency and to evaluate all the elements of the scale for content relevance. A convenient sample of 65 patients complained of LBP, completed BPFS and recompleted it to test-retest reliability after 2 days.Results: The Arabic adapted version of the BPFS was produced and validated. The scale index of clarity was 99%. Index of Content Validity (ICV) = 98.3%. The Cronbach’α coefficient for internal consistency was 0.865. The Total score of Spearman’s correlation coefficients is 0.878. Conclusion: The BPFS presented excellent reliability and validity for assessing the functional status in Arabic speaking patients with LBP.

Research topics

  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/ejpt.2021.56041.1027

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.