MARATTO

article · Minia Journal of Medical Research

Utility of CA125 in acute decompensated heart failure

20241 citationOpen accessMinia University

Abstract

Background: In acute decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF), Signs and symptoms are explained by congestion. Carbohydrate antigen (CA) 125, a tumor marker, is shown to be a surrogate for congestion and inflammation Aim: evaluating the utility of CA 125 in ADHF Methods: We investigated CA 125 compared to NT-proBNP in 70 participants (35 cases and 35 control) . Relationship of CA 125 to complications (Death or rehospitalization for HF) was assessed with its cost effectiveness compared to NT-ProBNP Results: CA 125 was significantly higher in ADHF cases than in controls (mean ± SD 39 ± 12.7 and 7.4 ± 10.8 respectively, At cut-off value 35 , CA125 predicted diagnosis of ADHF with 80% sensitivity, 88.6% specificity, ( p = 0.001 ). Patients with complications showed a higher level of CA 125 compared to uncomplicated patients (mean ± SD 45.9 ± 10.3 and 33.3 ± 11.8 respectively, At cut-off value 41 , CA125 predicted complications with 87.5% sensitivity, 69% specificity (p value 0.001) There was strong positive significant correlation coefficient between CA125 and NT-proBNP in diagnosis of ADHF (r = 0.81) with significant p value <0.05 and moderate positive correlation coefficient between CA125 and NT-proBNP among complicated cases was found (r=0.56) with significant p value <0.05. We found that CA 125 gives same value as NT-proBNP with less cost. Conclusion: CA125 level is high in patients with acute decompensated heart failure and predicts adverse prognosis. CA125 is a cost-effective test.

Research topics

  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Pharmaceutical studies and practices

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/mjmr.2024.265378.1649

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.