article · Archives of Cancer Science and Therapy
Bladder cancer is among the most costly malignancies to treat, primarily due to the high rate of recurrence for Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) and the subsequent necessity for lifelong cystoscopic surveillance. Although cystoscopy is widely regarded as the gold standard, it is an invasive procedure that can be costly and is associated with patient discomfort and anxiety. In recent years, a novel generation of urinary biomarkers (comprising genomic, epigenomic, and proteomic assays) has emerged, exhibiting diagnostic capabilities that increasingly challenge the prevailing role of cystoscopy in surveillance protocols. This mini-review examines the landscape of FDA-approved and emerging urinary biomarkers, compares their diagnostic accuracy, evaluates the first randomized controlled trials supporting biomarker-guided surveillance, and proposes a risk-stratified algorithm for the future integration of urinary biomarkers into clinical practice.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.29328/journal.acst.1001050
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.