MARATTO

article · PLoS ONE

Unpacking lithic assemblage variability in the Early Upper Palaeolithic: A multivariate approach to the structure of the Iberian Aurignacian

Abstract

The Aurignacian technocomplex of the Early Upper Palaeolithic remains a long-standing focal point for understanding the expansion of modern humans across Europe. Diagnostic assemblages occur across vast swathes of the continent, suggesting the existence of broadly connected groups and traditions around 43-32 ka cal BP. However, while its extensive distribution is often regarded as proxy evidence for the spread of modern human groups, artefact assemblages are known to be synchronically and diachronically variable in ways that reveal an inconsistent representation of diagnostic traits. In the Iberian Peninsula, this variability is exemplified by an idiosyncratic material record in which diverse Aurignacian assemblages occur alongside undiagnostic or 'culturally indeterminate' ones, leading many Aurignacian occupations to be disputed. In this paper, we assimilate this regional record through quantitative analyses of techno-typological attributes from all sufficiently published and chronologically relevant assemblages of the Early Upper Palaeolithic. Using two multivariate techniques, we first explore associations between assemblages and thereafter test whether inter-assemblage variability is related to spatial and temporal distances. Our results cast light on the spatial structure of variability by revealing that inter-assemblage differences increase with spatial distance but show no linear relationship to temporal distance. This spatial finding challenges the cross-regional applicability of the Aquitaine model of techno-typological change, whilst the absence of temporally structured variability suggests a heterogeneous representation of diagnostic traits across and within temporal classes of assemblages.

Research topics

  • Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Evolution and Paleontology Studies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345202

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.