MARATTO

article · Studies in Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis

Unpacking discursive strategies of humour and social commentary in selected skits of Adigun Alawada

2026Open accessLagos State University

Abstract

Social commentary, the act of using rhetorical means to provide commentary on social, cultural, political, or economic issues in a society conducted through the lens of humour, has received extensive attention from Nigerian academics. Nonetheless, there is a paucity of studies on social commentary and humour capturing multimodal features. The study fills this gap by undertaking a multimodal analysis that explores humour and social commentary in selected skits by Adigun Alawada on Instagram. Henri Bergson’s (1900) Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic, Norris' (2004) multimodal interaction analysis, and multimodal discourse analysis by Kress & van Leeuwen (2001) served as the study’s theoretical guide. Data were collected through the purposive sampling method and subjected to discursive analysis. Using the approaches, the study deconstructs how Alawada re-signifies mundane objects and practices into potent signs of economic precarity, gendered norms, and public health concerns. The findings demonstrate five principal thematic classifications in Adigun Alawada’s skits, including Nigerians performing religion for survival, marrying right, maternal credit in success narratives, laziness and work ethics, and advocating for healthy living. This study showcases the contemporary relevance of Henri Bergson’s theory while expanding the scope of Norris’s multimodal interaction theory applicability. The study recommends that further studies on other humourists using multimodal methods to deepen understanding of social commentary and humour in the digital space should be conducted.

Research topics

  • Humor Studies and Applications
  • Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.48185/spda.v7i1.2098

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.