article · Big Data and Cognitive Computing
Accurate forecasting of equity returns remains fundamentally constrained by weak short-horizon predictability, pronounced noise, and structural non-stationarity. While deep learning models have been widely applied to financial time series, most studies prioritize point prediction and provide limited guidance on reliable uncertainty quantification, particularly in emerging markets. This study developed an uncertainty-aware forecasting framework for the South African equity market by integrating variational mode decomposition (VMD), gated recurrent units (GRUs), and temporal conformal prediction (TCP) to construct distribution-free prediction intervals with finite-sample coverage guarantees. Using daily returns from the FTSE/JSE All Share Index, we first confirmed that baseline recurrent models applied directly to raw returns exhibited negligible out-of-sample explanatory power, consistent with weak-form market efficiency. Incorporating VMD enhanced representation learning and improved point forecast accuracy by isolating latent frequency components. However, model-based predictive variance alone proved insufficient for reliable calibration. Embedding the models within a rolling conformal prediction framework restored near-nominal coverage across multiple confidence levels while allowing interval widths to adapt dynamically to changing volatility regimes. Robustness analyses, including walk-forward validation, stress-regime evaluation, and block permutation negative control experiments, indicated that the observed performance was not driven by temporal leakage or alignment artifacts. The results further highlight a trade-off between interval sharpness and tail-risk protection, particularly during extreme market events. Overall, the findings support a shift from return-level prediction toward calibrated uncertainty estimation as a more stable and economically meaningful objective in non-stationary financial environments.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/bdcc10030093
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.