article · Journal of Anesthesia

Ultrasound-guided high-voltage pulsed radiofrequency versus standard-voltage pulsed radiofrequency in refractory chronic cervical radicular pain randomized clinical trial

Mohammed Awad Alsaeid
Mohammad Fouad Algyar
Ahmed Salah
Atef Mohamed Mahmoud
Omar Sayed Farghaly
Mina Maher Raouf

20251 citationOpen accessKafr el-Sheikh University

Abstract

HVPRF could significantly reduce pain and functional disabilities compared to SVPRF up to 6 months after intervention in patients suffering from unilateral resistant cervical radiculopathy. IRB number: Fayoum Faculty of Medicine Research Ethical Committee, approval no. R 427. Research registration number: Registry for Clinical Trials (NCT05749185).

Research topics

Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

View on publisher site Record on OpenAlex

DOI: 10.1007/s00540-025-03535-5

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.

New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.