MARATTO

article · South African Journal of Oncology

Two-year overall survival of children with cancer between 2015 and 2021 in Zimbabwe

Abstract

Background: Childhood cancer survival in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is low, and data are limited. Aim: We investigated 1-year and 2-year overall survival (OS) of children diagnosed with cancer in Zimbabwe between 2015 and 2021. Setting: Retrospective childhood cancer data from 2015 to 2022 were collected from KidzCan’s database. Methods: Demographic data, cancer diagnosis and performance status were collected to determine OS 2 years post-cancer diagnosis. Data were analysed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression analysis. Results: A total of 514 from 1090 childhood cancer cases were analysed (576 cases were excluded because of missing data). The mean age at diagnosis was 5.0 years (standard deviation 3.8), with a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.25. One-year OS was 38% (mean 7.5 months; 95% confidence interval [CI] [7.1–8.0]) and 2-year OS was 17.3% (mean 10 months; 95% CI [9.7–11.4]). Male cases (21.9%) had a better 2-year OS compared to female cases (10%) (p = 0.012). Lymphoma and retinoblastoma had the best 2-year OS (29% and 28%, respectively) (p = 0.002). Children active at diagnosis (28%) had an improved 2-year OS than those who were frail (11.5%) and bedridden (13%) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Sex, cancer diagnosis and performance status were associated with OS. Long-term follow-up is essential to determine long-term outcomes for all children treated with cancer. This study highlights the vital role of civil society organisations in supporting the establishment of a local childhood cancer registry. Contribution: This study will significantly contribute to understanding childhood cancer survival in LMICs like Zimbabwe and provide a baseline for future research.

Research topics

  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4102/sajo.v9i0.341

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.