article · BMC Public Health
Analysis of Demographic and Health Survey data spanning 2008 to 2022 evaluates the determinants of female genital mutilation among 6,517 women aged 15 to 49 in Kenya and Tanzania. While overall prevalence has decreased, rates remain high across both nations. Lower risks of undergoing the practice correspond with higher education levels, household wealth, urban living, and weekly radio exposure. Conversely, rural residency, religious justifications, and recent internet usage associate with higher vulnerability. Distinct national drivers are evident: prevalence in Kenya connects heavily with Muslim religious affiliation, whereas in Tanzania it aligns with rural agrarian livelihoods and occupational inequities. Addressing these country-specific patterns requires targeted strategies, including faith-sensitive approaches in Kenya and interventions tailored to rural traditions and digital messaging in Tanzania.
Female genital mutilation affects over 230 million women and girls globally, posing ongoing public health and gender equity challenges. Identifying specific socio-economic, geographic, and media-related drivers allows policymakers and health organisations to design targeted, culturally sensitive interventions rather than applying generic regional solutions.
The abstract does not indicate an application pathway, as it focuses on epidemiological survey analysis and public health policy recommendations rather than commercial products or technologies.
AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.
BACKGROUND: Female genital mutilation (FGM) remains a critical global public health challenge, with over 230 million affected women and girls, predominantly in Sub-Saharan Africa. Despite the reduction in FGM in both countries, the proportion of women who had FGM are still considerably high. Therefore, the study seeks to examine the socio-economic/demographic determinants of FGM in Kenya and Tanzania to inform more targeted interventions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data from 6,517 women aged 15-49 in Kenya and Tanzania (2008-2022) was conducted. Trends were assessed using weighted prevalence percentages and visualized via line graphs. Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for complex survey design, identified associations between FGM and socio-demographic, economic, and media-related determinants. RESULTS: Higher education (AOR = 0.25, p < 0.001), wealth (AOR = 0.62, p < 0.002), urban residence (AOR = 0.37, p < 0.001), and weekly radio exposure (AOR = 0.53, p < 0.001) significantly reduced FGM risks. Conversely, rural residence (AOR = 4.12, p < 0.001), religious mandates (AOR = 3.81, p < 0.001), and recent internet use (AOR = 2.40, p < 0.001) increased vulnerability. Contextual disparities emerged: Kenya's FGM was strongly associated with Muslim affiliation (AOR = 9.41, p < 0.001), while Tanzania's persistence stemmed from rural agrarian livelihoods and occupational inequities. Internet use paradoxically correlated with higher FGM prevalence, reflecting potential urban-rural divides in digital health messaging efficacy. CONCLUSION: Education, economic stability, urban living, literacy, and radio exposure lower FGM risks in Kenya and Tanzania, while rural poverty, limited education, religious justifications, and internet use increase them. FGM in Kenya is linked to Muslim practices, requiring faith-sensitive strategies, while in Tanzania, it is tied to rural ethnic traditions. Interestingly, higher internet use correlates with increased FGM prevalence, suggesting it may perpetuate harmful norms without targeted messaging. Effective interventions should integrate legal enforcement, community education, women's empowerment, and cultural partnerships, extending urban strategies to rural areas and combating misinformation through digital literacy. Limitations like cross-sectional design highlight the need for longitudinal research. Ongoing, context-driven efforts are crucial for eliminating FGM and advancing global gender equity.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-23519-0
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
