article · Metabolites
<b>Background</b>: The global transcriptome reprogramming in grapevines in response to powdery mildew remains poorly understood, despite its economic implications, especially the new cultivars. <b>Methods</b>: Thus, this study aimed to elucidate these changes through RNA sequencing in 'Yeniang No. 2' grapevine leaves infected with powdery mildew compared to healthy ones. <b>Results</b>: A total of six samples were subjected to transcriptome sequencing, resulting in 36.85 Gb of clean data. A minimum of 5.89 Gb of clean data was generated for each sample, with at least 92.24% of the clean data attaining a quality score of Q30. Clean reads from each sample were aligned to the designated reference genome. The mapping ratio varied between 88.77% and 89.66%. The high-quality sequencing data revealed 1219 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), of which the infection upregulated 790 and downregulated 429. Functional enrichment analyses revealed a significant activation of key defense-related pathways. These included plant-pathogen interaction, phenylpropanoid and flavonoid biosynthesis for creating antimicrobial compounds, glutathione metabolism for reducing oxidative stress, and oxidative phosphorylation for enhanced energy production. This indicates a coordinated, multi-faceted defense strategy. The study also uncovered a complex layer of post-transcriptional regulation, identifying 1883 novel genes and 22,210 alternative splicing events, primarily skipped exons and intron retention. Key hub proteins identified within interaction networks, along with these splicing changes, underscore a sophisticated defense involving transcriptional reprogramming and metabolic shifts. <b>Conclusions</b>: The genes and molecular markers discovered are valuable resources for marker-assisted breeding. Leveraging these findings, particularly hub genes and favorable splice variants, can accelerate the development of new grapevine cultivars with durable resistance to powdery mildew.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/metabo16030182
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.