MARATTO

article · Frontiers in Education

Tracing the evolution of STEM education: a bibliometric analysis

20249 citationsOpen accessMakerere University

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of scientific research in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education. One thousand six hundred twenty-three studies on STEM education published between 2013 and 2023 were analyzed using bibliometric methods to uncover trends over the past decade. The analysis commenced by searching the Scopus database Core Collection for “STEM Education” publications, and bibliometric data associated with these studies was collected. The collected publications were then analyzed using VOS-viewer, a bibliometric analysis tool, to examine various bibliographic attributes. The analysis focused on key aspects such as the number of publications per year, publication types, the language of publications, year Citation Analysis, Country Collaborations, Citation Analysis (Journal, Author, Institution and Document), Co-author Analysis (Author, Countries, Institution), Co-citation Analysis (Author), and Co-occurrences Analysis. The analysis findings were visualized using VOS-viewer, a bibliometric analysis tool to depict collaboration patterns and relationships. The analysis recommends future research in STEM education to enhance interdisciplinary collaboration, address the digital divide, and integrate informal learning environments. It also underscores the importance of international collaborations, teacher professional development, and robust assessment frameworks for measuring STEM education effectiveness.

Research topics

  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
  • Educational Innovations and Challenges

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1457938

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.