MARATTO

article · Journal of Engineering Research

Towards an intelligent prioritization flow of interventions in CMMS systems: An MCDM-based approach

2025Open accessIbn Tofail University

Abstract

The automation of processes within industries plays a crucial role, especially with recent technological advancements and the increasing availability of massive data from manufacturing processes. This creates new opportunities in maintenance. Often, within companies, intervention requests are generated through Computerized Maintenance Management Systems (CMMS), where users fill in predefined fields. However, the classification of these intervention requests is typically done manually. This manual prioritization process poses a significant risk of accumulating delays, resulting in additional costs, and increasing safety risks for users and equipment. This study proposes integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) into the CMMS tools to automate the prioritization process of maintenance intervention requests on machines. This process relies on several essential criteria to consider when making decisions, namely safety impact, failure criticality, equipment type, and incident declaration date, based on the data already recorded in the intervention recorded in the CMMS. This automated prioritization process will enhance decision-making analysis capacity, optimize maintenance resources, and ensure a timely and effective response. A case study was conducted in a Moroccan company specialized in steel manufacturing, equipped with a Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS), and the results demonstrate that the concept of an automated intervention request prioritization process is effective, practical, and improves maintenance resource management.

Research topics

  • BIM and Construction Integration
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Manufacturing Process and Optimization

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jer.2025.04.001

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.