report · Open MIND
Ghana faces chronic energy insecurity, with 35% of national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions originating mainly from thermal power sources. This study employs Climate, Land, Energy, and Water systems (CLEWs) modelling to evaluate three energy transition pathways through 2055: Baseline (BAU), Emission Reduction (EMR), and Nuclear Energy Addition (NUC). Results reveal that nuclear energy provides the most cost-effective decarbonization pathway at $51.49 billion, achieving substantial emission reductions by reducing reliance on biofuel and natural gas baseload generation. Conversely, the renewable-heavy EMR scenario, targeting 20.4% natural gas and biofuel emission reduction by 2030, a contribution to the overall 64 Mt CO2eq of Ghana’s emission, costs $97.95 billion, approximately 90% more than the nuclear pathway, due to extensive solar infrastructure, storage, and grid requirements. Both decarbonization scenarios decrease biofuel generation, with EMR achieving a 100 % reduction and NUC reducing biofuel generation by 12.6 %. The model's findings challenge conventional assumptions about the cost- and emission-effectiveness of renewable energy and suggest that nuclear power warrants serious consideration in Ghana's sustainable energy strategy, contingent on timely regulatory framework development and international partnerships.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18498806
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.