article
Motion analysis is one of the known ways used to establish whether an infant is normal or abnormal. Studies have indicated that there is a clear difference in terms of speed or even time taken to respond to stimuli. General movements (GMs) are spontaneous movements of infants that involves the entire body differing in speed, amplitude and sequence. The assessment of GMs has helped in identifying infants that are at risk of neurological disorders. GMs assessment is based on videos recorded by parents or caregivers which are then rated by a clinicians or trained professionals. The General Assessment Tool has worked well, however, it is time consuming and very expensive. Several techniques have been proposed to automate the General Movement assessment tool which include marker based techniques and markerless techniques. In our review we have systematically discussed the design features and technologies involved in both of them and identified both the strength and weakness. There after, we explain the reasons for their limited practical performance. We conclude by proposing a deep learning approach that can be used to possibly address the issues raised in the existing techniques.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1109/ict4da56482.2022.9971227
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.