Torsemide versus furosemide in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Loop diuretics are essential agents in the management of fluid overload conditions, heart failure and renal dysfunction. Despite their widespread use, there is ongoing debate regarding the relative efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes associated with furosemide and torsemide. By systematically analyzing existing literature, this study seeks to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the comparative effectiveness and safety profiles of these two medications , Helping to inform clinical decision-making and contribute to the optimization of diuretic therapy in patients with heart and kidney diseases. Methods We searched PubMed, Scopus, WOS, and Cochrane until February 2024 for relevant studies comparing the torsemide and furosemide in Heart failure patients. Outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause hospitalization, hospitalization for HF, and improvement of ≥ 1 in NYHA functional class. Results 16 studies were included in this meta-analysis with a total of 12545 patients, There were no significant results between the two drugs in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality or all-cause hospitalization, torsemide showed a reduction in hospitalization from heart failure (RR 0.85, 95% CI [0.71 to 1.02]), torsemide showed a significant improvement of ≥ 1 in NYHA functional class (OR 1.60, 95% CI [1.18, 2.17]). Conclusion There was no difference between torsemide and furosemide when it comes to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, but torsemide showed better results in reducing hospitalization rates and and improving quality of life.Hospitalization from heart failureImprovement ≥ 1 in NYHA class