article · Open MIND
Access to clean cooking energy remains a critical challenge in sub-Saharan Africa despite abundant solar irradiance. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of box-type solar cookers published between 2015 and 2025, integrating first-law and second-law thermodynamic assessment. Nineteen experimental and field-based studies were synthesized using a random-effects model. The pooled thermal efficiency was 34.7% (95% CI: 32.9–36.5%), while reported exergy efficiency ranged between 8–15%, indicating substantial irreversibility primarily due to radiative and convective losses. Standardized mean difference analysis (Hedges’ g = 0.82) confirms that double-reflector configurations produce statistically significant performance improvements compared to single-reflector systems. Insulation improvements contributed moderately but with diminishing marginal gains. A generalized predictive efficiency correlation and uncertainty propagation framework are proposed to enable standardized cross-study benchmarking. Despite thermodynamic advancement, adoption rates remain below 20% in several semi-arid regions, demonstrating that engineering optimization alone does not guarantee large-scale deployment. The study provides an integrated analytical foundation for evaluating thermodynamic ceilings and socio-technical scalability of solar cooking technologies.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18998055
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
