MARATTO

article · Journal of Natural Fibers

Thermo-Kinetic and Thermodynamic Assessment of Syagrus Romanzoffiana Fibers for Bioenergy via Pyrolysis

20251 citationOpen accessUniversity of Skikda

Abstract

The increased need for renewable energy has prompted the investigation of agro-waste biomass as a viable feedstock for biofuel production. Among them, lignocellulosic fibers have great potential due to their quantity and good composition. The pyrolytic behavior of Syagrus Romanzoffiana fibers (SRFs) was investigated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) at six heating rates (5–30°C/min) in a nitrogen atmosphere (flow rate: 60 mL/min), across a temperature range from ambient to 800°C. Fiber samples (5–10 mg, 2–5 mm) were analyzed for kinetic and thermodynamic properties. Pre-exponential factors and activation energies were determined using four isoconversional methods. The goal is to assess their thermal stability, kinetic characteristics, and thermodynamic suitability for bioenergy generation. A three-parallel Gaussian kinetic model was utilized to simulate the pyrolysis of SRFs, revealing hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin as major pseudo-components. The Flynn-Wall-Ozawa (FWO), Kissinger–Akahira–Sunose (KAS), Starink (STK), and Vyazovkin (VYK) isoconversional techniques were used to calculate activation energies, which ranged from 129.46 to 327.01 kJ/mol depending on the component. Thermodynamic studies indicated that the degradation processes are endothermic and non-spontaneous, with favorable entropy changes that enable effective pyrolytic conversion. These findings demonstrate that SRFs show strong potential as a sustainable cellulosic feedstock for bioenergy, supported by robust kinetic and thermodynamic analyses, though further validation of practical applications remains necessary.

Research topics

  • Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
  • Seed Germination and Physiology

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2025.2570107

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.