MARATTO

article · Journal of Medicinal Food

Therapeutic and Biological Properties of White Garlic and Black Garlic Extracts ( <i>Allium sativum</i> L.): A Comparative Analysis

Abstract

Black garlic is a rich natural source of beneficial compounds and exhibits various biological activities. This study aimed to quantify flavonoids and polyphenols in white garlic and black garlic extracts, evaluate their antioxidant power, assess their antibacterial activity against specific pathogenic bacteria, and examine their antiproliferative effects on U87 glioblastoma cancer cells. The extraction was conducted using distilled water, methanol, and ethanol, and the quantification of bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl test, antibacterial activity, and antiproliferative activity using the MTT assay. The findings of this research showed significantly higher levels of phenolic acids and flavonoids in black garlic compared to raw garlic, with methanol extracts containing the highest concentration of flavonoids (2.33 mg quercetin equivalent/g DM) and polyphenols (63.25 mg ascorbic acid equivalent/g DM). Both white garlic and black garlic extracts displayed excellent antioxidant activity, while methanol extracts of black garlic exhibited the highest inhibition percentages (96.3% ± 0.36). Methanol extracts of black garlic also demonstrated effective antibacterial activity, while the antiproliferative effects were significant for all extracts on U87 glioblastoma cancer cells. These findings highlight black garlic as a promising source of compounds with antiproliferative, antibacterial, and antioxidant properties, although the concentration of bioactive compounds may vary among different extracts.

Research topics

  • Garlic and Onion Studies
  • Phytochemical compounds biological activities
  • Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1089/jmf.2023.0229

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.