MARATTO

article · The Egyptian Journal of Neurology Psychiatry and Neurosurgery

The use of muscle ultrasound to detect critical illness myopathy in patients with sepsis: an observational cohort study

20241 citationOpen accessBeni Suef University

Abstract

Abstract Background Critical illness myopathy (CIM) has negative impact on patient outcomes. We aimed to explore the diagnostic value of bedside ultrasonography for early identification of CIM in septic patients and its correlation with other diagnostic methods. This prospective observational study included 40 ICU patients diagnosed with sepsis on admission or within 48 h later according to the third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). They were evaluated using muscle ultrasound, electrodiagnostic and clinical muscle assessment (Medical Research Council, MRC) at two time points, the first was between days 2 and 5 and the second was between days 10 and 15. Results There was significant deterioration of neuromuscular function between the two evaluation points demonstrated by decline in MRC, abnormal nerve conduction and electromyography (EMG) and increased muscle echogenicity on ultrasonography ( P ≤ 0.001). Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score significantly correlated with different neuromuscular assessment tools. MRC had significant correlation with myopathic EMG ( P ≤ 0.001, r = − 0.869) and increased muscle echogenicity ( P ≤ 0.001, r = − 0.715). Abnormal ultrasonographic muscle architecture had sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 75% and positive likelihood ratio of 4 in detecting muscle dysfunction compared to myopathic EMG. Conclusions Bedside peripheral muscle ultrasound echogenicity grade could be used as an additional screening test in ICU septic patients for early detection of CIM.

Research topics

  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Therapeutic Uses of Natural Elements

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1186/s41983-024-00808-w

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.