article · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
This paper theorized space, place and spatiality as not simply the sites where deviance and crime occur, but also as which actually construct deviant behavior and crime within African urban society, thus moving the focus of analysis away from individual pathology towards a relational geography of crime. The analysis examines cases of South Africa, Nigeria and Kenya and argues that crime is not just simply an expression of individual maladjustment, but a direct result of spatial interaction and practices which are often realized in sites of historic marginality. In particular, it posits that combining spatial criminological concepts such as defensible space, routine activity and crime pattern theory with Lefebvre's notion of the social production of space highlights how colonial and post-colonial urban design, the construction of informal settlements, and post-colonial state deficit actually construct criminogenic space.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.