MARATTO

article · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

The SARAO MeerKAT Galactic Plane Survey filamentary source catalogue

20241 citationOpen accessTechnical University of Kenya

Abstract

ABSTRACT We present a catalogue of filamentary structures identified in the SARAO (South African Radio Astronomy Observatory) MeerKAT 1.3 GHz Galactic Plane Survey (SMGPS). We extract 933 filaments across the survey area, 803 of which (${\sim }86~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$) are associated with extended radio structures (e.g. supernova remnants and H ii regions), while 130 (${\sim }14~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$) are largely isolated. We classify filaments as thermal or non-thermal via their associated mid-infrared emission and find that 77/130 (${\sim }59~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$) of the isolated sources are likely to be non-thermal, and are therefore excellent candidates for the first isolated, non-thermal radio filaments observed outside of the Galactic Centre (GC). Comparing the morphological properties of these non-thermal candidates to the non-thermal filaments observed towards the GC, we find that the GC filaments are on the whole angularly narrower and shorter than those across the SMGPS, potentially an effect of distance. The SMGPS filaments have flux densities similar to those of the GC; however, the distribution of the latter extends to higher flux densities. If the SMGPS filaments were closer than the GC population, it would imply a more energetic population of cosmic ray electrons in the GC. We find that the filament position angles in the SMGPS are uniformly distributed, implying that the local magnetic field traced by the filaments does not follow the large-scale Galactic field. Finally, although we have clearly shown that filaments are not unique to the GC, the GC nevertheless has the highest density of filaments in the Milky Way.

Research topics

  • Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stae2690

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.