MARATTO

preprint · Research Square (Research Square)

The mediation and moderation effect of risk preferences on time preference and financial literacy

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates the mediation and moderation effect of risk preference on time preferences and financial literacy. Existing studies show that people with higher levels of financial literacy are more likely to achieve better life outcomes. Better life outcomes depend on an individual’s knowledge and intertemporal choices executed in a context where inherent risk is prevalent. Regardless, existing studies directly evaluate the effects of financial literacy on intertemporal decisions. The current study brings in a different dimension by accounting for risk preferences' mediation and moderation role on financial literacy and time preferences. We collected data from 191 university students in South Africa using Multiple Price List (MPL) time preference and risk preference elicitation, a questionnaire, and a financial literacy test. A maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) of a pooled panel structural equation model (SEM) analysis was employed. The headline finding is that risk preferences fully mediate the impact of financial literacy on time preferences. The random effect panel regression on the moderation effect of time-risk preferences on financial literacy and financial literacy-risk preferences on time preferences confirms reverse causality between time preferences and financial literacy. The moderation effect of risk preferences on time preferences and financial literacy varies from one category of subjects to another. Risk aversion is associated with high levels of financial literacy. JEL: C91; G4

Research topics

  • Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3987720/v1

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.