MARATTO

article · BMC Surgery

The knowledge-perception nexus: socio-linguistic disparities in surgical informed consent among patients at Ethiopian tertiary hospitals

2026Open accessAddis Ababa University

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical informed consent (SIC), the ethical bedrock of patient autonomy is undermined by profound sociodemographic disparities in resource-limited settings. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge-perception nexus and sociolinguistic determinants of SIC comprehension among surgical patients in Ethiopian tertiary hospitals. METHODS: This institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 412 surgical patients in Addis Ababa tertiary hospitals between March 8 to April 30, 2023. The validated interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to assess knowledge and perceptions. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant characteristics, and multivariable logistic regression identified predictors (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Only 52.2% demonstrated adequate SIC knowledge; 57.8% had positive perceptions. strongest knowledge predictors were higher education (AOR = 5.21, 95% CI: 3.12-8.68), prior surgery (AOR = 4.58, 95% CI: 2.87-7.32), male sex (AOR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.52-3.42), and native-language proficiency (AOR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.09-3.07). Favorable perception associated with urban residence (AOR = 3.99, 95% CI: 2.34-6.80) and marriage (AOR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.16-2.78). Adequate knowledge independently predicted positive perception (AOR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.02-2.62), explaining 68% of perception variance. CONCLUSION: Surgical patients in Ethiopia demonstrated inadequate knowledge and perceptions of informed consent, influenced by gender, education, residence, and language barriers. The association between knowledge and perception highlights the need for culturally appropriate interventions, including teach-back methods and shared decision-making to improve informed consent practices and surgical care outcomes in resource-limited settings.

Research topics

  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1186/s12893-026-03872-6

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.