MARATTO

article · Hydrogen

The Integrity and Tightness of Underground Hydrogen Storage Systems: A Critical Review of Geological Barriers, Well Sealing, Leakage Risks and Future Perspectives

In plain language

Storing green hydrogen underground is vital for deploying renewable energy at scale, but confining small, highly mobile hydrogen molecules for decades presents major technical hurdles. Containment performance varies across geological formations, including salt caverns, deep aquifers, depleted reservoirs, lined rock caverns and repurposed abandoned mines. While salt formations benefit from viscoplastic, self-healing properties that assist confinement, the interfaces between salt and cement, as well as general well infrastructure, remain vulnerable. Across all underground storage options, well integrity represents the primary risk factor for hydrogen leakage. Potential escape pathways include diffusion, advection, microcracking, cement degradation and complex hydrogen-material interactions. Geological storage also contends with geomechanical shifts, microbial reactions and regulatory challenges. Integrating hydrogen storage with carbon capture, utilisation and storage offers potential synergies, but overall success depends on targeted monitoring priorities, clear design criteria and further research into storage tightness.

Key takeaways

  • Well integrity and sealing materials represent the dominant risk factor for hydrogen leakage across all underground storage formations.
  • Salt caverns offer advantageous viscoplastic and self-healing properties for containment, though salt-cement interfaces remain vulnerable.
  • Hydrogen leakage underground can occur via diffusion, advection, microcracking, cement degradation and material interactions.
  • Deep aquifers, depleted reservoirs, lined rock caverns and abandoned mines provide alternative storage options with distinct operational configurations.

Why it matters

Large-scale renewable energy systems require safe, long-term energy storage to balance supply and demand. Green hydrogen can provide this capacity if stored underground in massive quantities. However, because hydrogen molecules easily escape through minuscule defects and degrade materials, identifying leakage pathways and improving well integrity are essential steps toward preventing environmental hazards and ensuring the safe operation of future clean energy infrastructure.

Commercialisation angle

This review provides design criteria, risk assessments and monitoring priorities for energy operators, engineers and regulators developing underground hydrogen storage facilities. The work is at an early review stage, intended to underpin future experimental and numerical research. While practical applications include repurposing depleted gas fields, salt caverns or abandoned mines, commercial-scale deployment requires resolving critical well-sealing vulnerabilities and establishing robust containment verification protocols.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Underground storage of green hydrogen is a strategic enabler of large-scale renewable deployment, but its feasibility rests on a hard problem: keeping a small, highly mobile molecule confined underground for decades without safety or environmental risk. This critical review examines the containment mechanisms of hydrogen across underground storage types, focusing on geological barriers, well integrity and sealing materials. We evaluate the containment capabilities of salt cavities, deep aquifers and depleted reservoirs, with particular attention to the viscoplastic, self-healing properties of salt that promote confinement, and to the vulnerabilities of well infrastructure and salt–cement interfaces. Emerging alternatives, including lined rock caverns and repurposed abandoned mines, are assessed alongside their distinct operating configurations and use cases. Leakage mechanisms including diffusion, advection, microcracking, cement degradation and hydrogen–material interactions are analysed alongside geomechanical modelling, microbial activity, monitoring strategies, regulatory frameworks, and techno-economic and environmental considerations, including the integration of carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) with underground hydrogen storage. Well integrity emerges as the dominant risk factor across storage types. The review concludes with design criteria, monitoring priorities and research needs to guide the safe, sustainable deployment of underground hydrogen storage, providing a scientific foundation for future numerical and experimental work on storage tightness.

Research topics

  • CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
  • Coal Properties and Utilization

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/hydrogen7030116

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.