MARATTO

article · NIU journal of humanities.

The Implication of Government Bias on the Resolution of Communal Conflict in Nigeria

2025Open accessOsun State University

Abstract

The incidence of communal conflicts in Nigeria has been on the rise since the 1990s. these conflicts cut across all sections of the country, from the North to South. Interestingly, these conflicts are mostly anchored on disputes over land and the dichotomy between indigene and settlers. As one with the monopoly of force, the state, through the government is expected to be an effective arbiter but this has not been the case in terms of government intervention in communal conflict in the country. The reason for this is the perceived bias by the parties on government intervention. The implication of such perceived bias is that it is difficult to resolve such conflicts. This study argued that there are standard procedures that the government is expected to follow if its intervention will sail through. The study maintained that these procedures would help in building trust in government by the parties for a smooth resolution of communal conflict. Keywords: Conflict, conflict resolution, communal conflict, land, communal bias.

Research topics

  • Natural Resources and Economic Development
  • African Education and Politics
  • Conflict Management and Negotiation

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.58709/niujhu.v10i4.2352

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.