article · International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies
This systematic literature review investigates the impact of L1 and L2 glosses on EFL learners' incidental vocabulary learning via reading. The review aims to synthesize and analyze existing empirical research on the topic, identify the most effective glossing method, and highlight reasons why some glosses may be more effective. The review's research questions are: (1) How is incidental vocabulary operationalized in these studies? (2) Do L1 and L2 glosses differ in their effect on incidental vocabulary learning? and (3) Why do some learners benefit from one type (L1/L2) of gloss more than the other? The review follows a systematic methodology, involving a comprehensive search using SCOPUS databases, rigorous inclusion/exclusion criteria, and data extraction and synthesis methods. The results suggest that L1 and L2 glosses have a positive effect on EFL learners' incidental vocabulary learning through reading, but there is a lack of consensus on which language is more effective. The review highlights the lack of gloss studies among Arabs.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.36892/ijlts.v5i3.479
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.