MARATTO

article · FUDMA Journal of Sciences

THE GEOCHEMISTRY OF VOLCANIC PLUGS INTRUDING SHALES OF THE PINDIGA FORMATION, GONGOLA SUB-BASIN, NORTHERN BENUE TROUGH, NIGERIA: IMPLICATIONS FOR PROVENANCE, WEATHERING, AND TECTONIC SETTING

2026Open accessGombe State University

Abstract

This study presents a geochemical investigation of volcanic plugs intruding the Cretaceous shales of the Pindiga Formation in the Gongola Sub-Basin, Northern Benue Trough, Nigeria. Eight representative samples comprising basalts (n = 4), shales (n = 3) and sandstone (n = 1) were analyzed for major oxides using wavelength-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (WD-XRF). Analytical accuracy was monitored using certified reference standards and analytical precision is better than ±5% for major oxides. The basaltic plugs plot within the sub-alkaline field on the TAS diagram and display a tholeiitic affinity on the AFM diagram. One basalt sample shows a peraluminous signature (A/CNK > 1), which may reflect assimilation of Al-rich country rocks during magma emplacement. Geochemical proxies suggest that the shales were predominantly derived from mafic igneous sources and are classified as Fe-shales. High Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA = 85.39–95.67) and low Index of Compositional Variability (ICV = 0.31–0.51) indicate intense chemical weathering under humid paleoclimatic conditions. Major-element tectonic discrimination diagrams suggest a tectonic setting consistent with an active continental margin, although interpretations are made cautiously due to the limited dataset and the known limitations of major-element proxies. The results provide new geochemical constraints on the relationship between Cenozoic magmatism and the Cretaceous sedimentary succession of the Gongola Sub-Basin.

Research topics

  • Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.33003/fjs-2026-1003-4532

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.