article · Biology
The insufficient availability of safe water has emerged as a prevalent issue severely impacting public health in developing nations. Moreover, studies reporting the efficacy of treatment plants (TPs)—specifically Phragmites karka and Typha latifolia—in removing toxic elements in aquaculture wastewater are scanty. Therefore, this study is aimed at investigating the effects of hydraulic retention time (HRT), seasonal variations, and TPs on the removal efficiency of pollutants from a vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland (VSSF-CW) in Nigeria. The experiments spanned three seasons (November–December–January—NDJ; March–April–May—MAM; and July–August–September—JAS) of the year, with samples collected from the CW at 7 day intervals for analysis. The aquaculture wastewater was analyzed in the laboratory to determine its chemical and toxic compositions before and after the introduction of treatment plants. Three-way ANOVA was used to analyze the main and interactive effects between HRT, seasons, and TPs on the physicochemical properties of the CW’s effluents. The removal efficiency was determined to evaluate the performance of the constructed wetland in comparison to the treatment plants. Results showed that these constructed wetlands effectively removed contaminants, with significant differences (p < 0.05) mostly observed in the effects of treatment plant types and seasons on the chemical and heavy metal concentrations. This was further confirmed by the main effects of HRT, seasons, and treatment plant choice, which significantly (p < 0.05) influenced treatment efficiency. Removal efficiencies increased with longer HRTs, reaching peak removal efficiencies of approximately 69, 67, and 61% for Na, K, and Ca, respectively. The BOD and COD reached 85 and 90% removal efficiency, while removal efficiency of 100% was achieved for most heavy metals at 21 day retention time. In summary, the study found that TPs (Phragmites karka and Typha latifolia), HRT, and seasonal variation are important for treating integrated poultry and aquaculture wastewater in a VSSF CWs.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/biology14101390
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.