article · International Journal of Education and Emerging Practices
Biology is a core subject in Nigeria’s senior secondary curriculum, yet students consistently record low achievement, with credit pass rates in the West African Senior School Certificate Examination (WASSCE) and the National Examinations Council (NECO) rarely exceeding 45% in recent years. This underperformance is largely attributed to lecture-dominated teaching, limited experiential learning opportunities, declining student interest, and weak motivation. While these factors have been studied individually, their combined influence remains underexplored. This study examined the effect of high-frequency experiential learning activities, interest, and motivation on Biology achievement among 120 SS2 students in Ekiti State, Nigeria. A quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test non-equivalent control group design was adopted. Using multi-stage stratified random sampling, four public secondary schools (two urban, two rural) were selected, and intact classes were randomly assigned to experimental (n = 60) and control (n = 60) groups. The experimental group underwent a 10-week intervention involving three structured, inquiry-based practical sessions per week, whereas the control group followed the conventional low-exposure approach. Data were collected via the Biology Achievement Test (BAT), Interest in Biology Questionnaire (IBQ), and Motivation in Biology Scale (MBS) administered as pre-test and post-test. ANCOVA, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analyses showed that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group. Interest and motivation were significantly higher and correlated strongly with achievement. Together, the three factors explained 54% of variance in post-test scores, with experiential activities and motivation as the strongest predictors. The study recommends mandatory high-frequency, inquiry-based practical work and teacher training to improve Biology performance.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.63236/injeep.1.3.4
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.