MARATTO

article · IPS Interdisciplinary Journal of Biological Sciences

The Burden of Antibiotic Resistance: Evaluating the Impact of Multiple Antibiotic-Resistant Enteric Bacteria in Academic Environments

2025Open accessImo State University

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of multiple antibiotic-resistant enteric bacteria in academic environments poses a significant health risk to students and staff, potentially leading to outbreaks of difficult-to-treat infections. This study aims to evaluate the burden of antibiotic resistance and its impact on the academic community's health and well-being. A total of 45 swab samples from board dusters were screened for enteric bacterial isolates using standard microbiological techniques. The results revealed four bacterial species: Escherichia coli O157:H7, Escherichia coli JKHS016, Klebsiella pneumoniae 2014C06-125, and Klebsiella pneumoniae Kp2092. Antibiotic susceptibility testing showed 54.72% of isolates were resistant, while 45.28% were susceptible. Notably, 34.48% exhibited single antibiotic resistance, and 65.52% displayed multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR). Statistical analysis confirmed the significance (p ≤ 0.05) of these findings. This study highlights the significant burden of antibiotic resistance in academic environments, particularly on board dusters. The prevalence of multiple antibiotic-resistant enteric bacteria, including Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, poses a considerable health risk to students and staff. The high rate of multiple antibiotic resistance (65.52%) underscores the need for improved hygiene practices, regular disinfection, and antimicrobial stewardship in academic settings to mitigate the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and protect the health and well-being of the academic community.

Research topics

  • Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Infection Control in Healthcare

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.54117/iijbs.v4i4.78

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.