MARATTO

article · Sustainability

Sustainable Geopolymer Tuff Composites Utilizing Iron Powder Waste: Rheological and Mechanical Performance Evaluation

20258 citationsOpen accessUniversity Ferhat Abbas of Setif

Abstract

Geopolymers are a sustainable alternative to Portland cement, with the potential to significantly reduce the carbon footprint of conventional cement production. This study investigates the valorization of industrial waste iron powder (IP) as a fine filler in geopolymers synthesized from volcanic tuff (VTF). Composites were prepared with IP substitutions of 5%, 10%, and 20% by weight, using sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate as alkaline activators. Microstructural and phase analyses were conducted using scanning electron microscope coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), while rheological properties, compressive strength, and flexural strength were assessed. The impact of curing temperatures (25 °C and 80 °C) on mechanical performance was evaluated. Results revealed that air content increased to 3.5% with 20% IP substitution, accompanied by a slight rise in flow time (0.8–2 s). Compressive and flexural strengths at 25 °C decreased by up to 22.48% and 28.39%, respectively. Elevated curing at 80 °C further reduced compressive and flexural strengths by an average of 45.30% and 64.68%, highlighting the adverse effects of higher temperatures. Although these formulations are not suitable for load-bearing applications, the findings suggest potential for non-structural uses, such as pavement base layers, aligning with sustainable construction principles by repurposing industrial waste and reducing reliance on energy-intensive cement production.

Research topics

  • Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
  • Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/su17031240

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.