article · Pure and Applied Chemistry
This project developed checklists, resources, and computer-based tools to support scientific reviewing in material property research. The aim is to streamline the reviewing process, making it easier and more efficient. These tools help ensure that scientific publications include all necessary primary and supporting information about substances, conditions, properties, and techniques. This detailed reporting, using understandable terminology, is crucial for ensuring the reproducibility of research results. The underlying principles and ideas from this initiative are designed to be adaptable and extended to other scientific disciplines, promoting higher standards across various fields.
Improving the scientific reviewing process is vital for maintaining the integrity and reliability of research. By providing tools that ensure comprehensive reporting and reproducibility, this work helps to build trust in scientific findings and accelerates progress by making research results more dependable and verifiable for future studies.
The abstract describes the creation of tools and principles to improve scientific reviewing and reproducibility within academic publishing. It does not indicate a direct application pathway for commercialisation, nor does it identify specific users or a market for a product or service.
AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.
Abstract In order to support scientific reviewing in the area of material property research and make the reviewing process easier and more efficient, checklists covering typical problems, lists of available resources, and computer-based and online tools to help compose reviewers’ reports have been created. Our intention is to ensure that scientific communications show necessary and sufficient primary and supporting information about substances studied, conditions, properties, and techniques of interest with understandable terminology, in detail assuring reproducibility of the obtained results. The principles and ideas of this project can be extended to other scientific areas.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1515/pac-2025-0577
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
