MARATTO

article · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

Sub-window inference: A novel approach for improved sheep counting in high-density aerial images

20241 citationOpen accessStellenbosch University

Abstract

Traditional sheep counting methods are labour-intensive, time-consuming, and potentially disruptive to sheep behaviour. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and machine learning (ML) techniques have emerged to address these challenges by automating the process. However, these solutions face difficulties due to low object-to-image-pixel ratios and high object densities in images captured for sheep counting, which can compromise detection and counting accuracy. In this study, we introduce and evaluate a novel approach, sub-window inference, designed to increase the object-to-image-pixel ratios, thereby enhancing the performance of existing object detection and segmentation models. Our method was compared to four other object counting techniques, demonstrating superior performance in terms of a reduced mean absolute error (MAE) of 3.21 sheep and a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 1.27%. Furthermore, our findings indicate that incorporating random cropping data augmentation during model training significantly enhances both detection and counting accuracy. It is important to note that a limitation of sub-window inference is that it does not facilitate real-time count predictions. Overall, our proposed method of sub-window inference reduces the MAE in automated sheep counting techniques involving UAVs and ML, presenting a highly effective solution that benefits sheep farmers. • Low object-to-image-pixel ratios have adverse effects on detection performance. • Smaller objects tend to have lower object-to-image-pixel ratios. • Sub-cropping input images improves object-to-image-pixel ratios and detection results. • Random cropping data augmentation during training improves detection and counting accuracy.

Research topics

  • Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Remote-Sensing Image Classification

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.109271

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.