MARATTO

preprint · Research Square (Research Square)

Study of Neutrophil CD64 and HLA-DR as Early Detection Markers of Sepsis in Hepatic ICU Patients

2024Open accessMenoufia University

Abstract

<title>Abstract</title> Background Sepsis is the commonest cause of death in liver cirrhosis patients. Aim Evaluation of neutrophil and monocyte CD64 and HLA-DR as early biomarkers predicting sepsis in liver cirrhosis. Methods This case-control study involved 70 cirrhotic patients (35 with sepsis and 35 without) and 30 healthy individuals. Laboratory studies were performed, including CD64 and HLA-DR using flow cytometry along with sepsis index (SI). Results Patients were mainly males (80%), aged 62.17 and 64.69 years respectively. <bold>Mono CD64%</bold> at <bold>Cut-off</bold>: &gt;62.9 showed <bold>AUC</bold>: 0.676, <bold>Sensitivity</bold>: 80.0%, <bold>Specificity</bold>: 60.0%, <bold>PPV</bold>: 66.7%, and <bold>NPV</bold>: 75.0%. while <bold>Mono CD64 MFI</bold> at <bold>Cut-off</bold> &gt; 9.5 shoed <bold>AUC</bold>: 0.659, <bold>Sensitivity</bold>: 94.29%, <bold>Specificity</bold>: 37.14%, <bold>PPV</bold>: 60.0%, and <bold>NPV</bold>: 86.7%. Combinations of <bold>CRP + Lactate + Mono CD64%+ Mono CD64 MFI revealed AUC</bold>: 0.929, <bold>Sensitivity</bold>: 82.86%, <bold>Specificity</bold>: 91.43%, <bold>PPV</bold>: 90.6%, and <bold>NPV</bold>: 84.2% Mono CD64% and CD64 MFI (0.003; 0.03) respectively. Regression analysis defined Mono CD64% &gt;62.9 (OR 6), Mono CD64 MFI &gt; 9.5 (OR 9.75), CRP &gt; 32.4 (OR 13.5), lactate &gt; 1.93 (OR 12.08), and ALBI score &gt; 0.01 (OR 6) all as factors affecting early sepsis in cirrhosis. Conclusion Mono CD64% and Mono CD64 MFI proved efficacy as early septic biomarkers with higher efficacy when combined with traditional inflammatory markers in liver cirrhosis patients.

Research topics

  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4331509/v1

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.