MARATTO

article · Frontiers in Microbiology

Study of grapevine endophytes’ interaction with the host and their potential as biocontrol agents as sustainable alternative to agrochemicals

Abstract

In sustainable vineyard management, biocontrol agents (BCAs) offer a promising alternative to chemical pesticides. This study focuses on characterizing endophytes isolated from grapevines in different regions of northern Italy for (i) their effectiveness against <i>Botrytis cinerea</i> through <i>in vitro</i> tests and (ii) their capability to survive in the presence of copper and other commercial fungicides with the final goal of investigating their possible future application for an integrated approach in vineyard. <i>Aureobasidium pullulans</i> strains ED203, ED206, ED217, and ED221 demonstrated significant antagonistic activity toward <i>B. cinerea</i>, while <i>Bacillus velezensis</i> ED163 showed the highest levels of pathogen inhibition. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) analysis identified three distinct microbial clusters based on BCAs volatile profiles, highlighting the production of antifungal compounds such as alcohols, esters, and terpenes to counteract the pathogen growth. The investigated BCAs showed tolerance to high concentrations of copper (up to 100 mg/L) and the fungicide SWITCH (1 g/L), but they were sensitive to a standard oenological dose of sulfur dioxide (50 mg/L). Finally, <i>in vivo</i> tests on grapevine leaves confirmed the ability of <i>B. velezensis</i> and <i>A. pullulans</i> strains ED203 and ED221 candidates to effectively reduce the mycelium infection on plant tissue standing out as strong candidates for pest management. The interaction between BCAs with the host was confirmed through leaves cell culture use, highlighting the capability of the best candidate selected in the study to modulate plant response in presence of pathogen.

Research topics

  • Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Plant and fungal interactions
  • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2026.1758446

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.