review · Indian Journal of Psychiatry
Stigma surrounding mental illness operates across individual, societal, and organisational levels, disproportionately affecting vulnerable groups such as children, older adults, and gender minorities. It leads to worsened psychological conditions, reduced healthcare access, and poorer adherence to treatments. While high-income nations maintain well-established anti-stigma programmes with positive outcomes, literature on low- and middle-income countries, particularly across Asia, has historically lacked comprehensive synthesis. An analysis of database and grey literature shows that anti-stigma efforts in these regions tend to be broad rather than disorder-specific, aimed at whole populations rather than tailored to patients or healthcare workers, and heavily reliant on education rather than direct contact or behavioural change. Furthermore, these regional initiatives currently lack data on long-term effectiveness, indicating a pressing need for multi-sectoral coordination, cultural adaptation, and systematic nationwide research.
Mental illness stigma creates profound obstacles to seeking and completing psychiatric treatment, worsening health outcomes for vulnerable populations. Understanding how anti-stigma approaches in low- and middle-income regions differ from those in high-income settings enables policymakers, international organisations, and healthcare professionals to design targeted programmes that fit local cultural contexts rather than relying on ineffective, generic campaigns.
The abstract does not indicate an immediate commercial application pathway, as it focuses on literature synthesis and public health policy recommendations. However, the findings highlight an early-stage need for healthcare organisations, non-governmental bodies, and governments to develop and evaluate structured, culture-specific intervention frameworks, behavioural training modules, and longitudinal assessment tools tailored to healthcare workers, caregivers, and patient groups.
AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.
Background: Stigma related to mental illness (and its treatment) is prevalent worldwide. This stigma could be at the structural or organizational level, societal level (interpersonal stigma), and the individual level (internalized stigma). Vulnerable populations, for example, gender minorities, children, adolescents, and geriatric populations, are more prone to stigma. The magnitude of stigma and its negative influence is determined by socio-cultural factors and macro (mental health policies, programs) or micro-level factors (societal views, health sectors, or individuals' attitudes towards mentally ill persons). Mental health stigma is associated with more serious psychological problems among the victims, reduced access to mental health care, poor adherence to treatment, and unfavorable outcomes. Although various nationwide and well-established anti-stigma interventions/campaigns exist in high-income countries (HICs) with favorable outcomes, a comprehensive synthesis of literature from the Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), more so from the Asian continent is lacking. The lack of such literature impedes growth in stigma-related research, including developing anti-stigma interventions. Aim: To synthesize the available mental health stigma literature from Asia and LMICs and compare them on the mental health stigma, anti-stigma interventions, and the effectiveness of such interventions from HICs. Materials and Methods: PubMed and Google Scholar databases were screened using the following search terms: stigma, prejudice, discrimination, stereotype, perceived stigma, associate stigma (for Stigma), mental health, mental illness, mental disorder psychiatric* (for mental health), and low-and-middle-income countries, LMICs, High-income countries, and Asia, South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation/SAARC (for countries of interest). Bibliographic and grey literature were also performed to obtain the relevant records. Results: The anti-stigma interventions in Asia nations and LMICs are generalized (vs. disorder specific), population-based (vs. specific groups, such as patients, caregivers, and health professionals), mostly educative (vs. contact-based or attitude and behavioral-based programs), and lacking in long-term effectiveness data. Government, international/national bodies, professional organizations, and mental health professionals can play a crucial in addressing mental health stigma. Conclusion: There is a need for a multi-modal intervention and multi-sectoral coordination to mitigate the mental health stigma. Greater research (nationwide surveys, cultural determinants of stigma, culture-specific anti-stigma interventions) in this area is required.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_667_23
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
