article · World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
both timely and relevant. Their retrospective analysis provides crucial data to resolve a common clinical dilemma: Plastic stent (PS) or metal stent (MS) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage in patients aged 70 and older? This editorial contextualizes their key finding, that PS and MS offer comparable patency in mixed cohorts, but MS significantly prolongs time to recurrent biliary obstruction in malignant cases without antegrade stenting, into a practical decision-making framework. We argue that for benign disease, the ease of PS reintervention is paramount in a frail population. Conversely, for malignancy, the goal shifts to maximizing stent patency to minimize the physical and psychological burden of repeated procedures, firmly favoring the use of MS. This work is a significant step toward personalized, age-specific biliary drainage strategies, and we discuss the imperative for future prospective trials to solidify these recommendations.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v18.i1.116517
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.