article · Journal of Natural Fibers
Characterizing the mechanical behavior of natural fibers presents unique statistical challenges. In our study, 82% of the initial datasets (n = 35) exhibited non-normality (Shapiro-Wilk p < .05). Tensile tests using an Instron 5969 machine provided stress (120–450 MPa), strain (5–25%), and modulus (3–28 GPa) data requiring careful transformation. We evaluated four methods – logarithmic, square root, Box-Cox (optimal λ = 0.32), and Johnson – with Box-Cox showing the best performance for modulus (89% normality). Overall, 68% of datasets achieved acceptable normality (p > .05), though extreme λ values (−1 or 2) reduced physical interpretability. Skewness also had to remain below 0.5 to ensure valid microstructure correlations. The novelty of this work lies in the creation of a tailored statistical protocol that balances transformation efficiency with material relevance. By integrating multiple validation tests (Q-Q plots, Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov) and ensuring a coefficient of variation below 15%, we provide a robust, reproducible method for natural fiber analysis. This approach enhances both the statistical reliability and practical usability of mechanical data in sustainable materials research.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2025.2544176
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.