MARATTO

review · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Standard- versus extended-duration anticoagulation for primary venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients

20244 citationsOpen accessAin Shams University

Abstract

In the short term, extended- versus standard-duration anticoagulation for primary VTE prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients reduced the risk of symptomatic VTE at the expense of an increased risk of major bleeding. Extended-duration anticoagulation resulted in little to no difference in all-cause mortality. Extended-duration anticoagulation reduced the risk of total VTE and the composite of fatal and irreversible vascular events, but may show little to no difference in fatal bleeding and VTE-related mortality. Further data, with longer follow-up, are needed to determine the optimal agent and duration for primary VTE prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients.

Research topics

  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014541.pub2

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.