MARATTO

preprint · arXiv (Cornell University)

Spectroscopic study of the Quiescent Stages in between the 2006 and 2021 outbursts of RS Ophiuchi

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive spectroscopic analysis of the quiescent stage of the recurrent nova RS Ophiuchi between its 2006 and 2021 outbursts. The spectra shows prominent low-ionization emission features, including hydrogen, helium, iron emissions, and TiO absorption features. The \ion{H}{$α$} and \ion{H}{$β$} lines showed double-peaked emission profiles, indicating that both originate from the accretion disc. The central peaks of the \ion{H}{$α$} and \ion{H}{$β$} emission profiles exhibited subtle shifts towards the blue or red side, attributed to orbital motion and fluctuations in the accretion rate. Using the double-peak features observed in the \ion{H}{$α$} and \ion{H}{$β$} lines, we have estimated the accretion disc size to be \( R_{AD} = 3.10 \pm 0.04 \times 10^{12} \, \text{cm} \). The \textsc{cloudy} photoionization code is employed to model the quiescent phase spectra, allowing us to study the evolution of various physical parameters such as temperature, luminosity, hydrogen density, elemental abundances, accreted mass, and accretion rate. The central ionizing sources exhibit temperatures in the range of $1.05 - 1.80~\times 10^4$ K and luminosities between $0.10 - 7.94~\times 10^{30}$ \ergs. The mean accretion rate, calculated from the model, is $\sim$ $1.25 \times 10^{-8} M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$. The model results reveal that the accretion rate rose substantially in the later phase. The accreted mass in the 16 months, preceding the 2021 outburst exceeds 47\% of the critical mass, and more than 88\% of the critical mass was accreted in the last three years.

Research topics

  • Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
  • Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2402.03234

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.