MARATTO

article · Discover Soil.

Source apportionment and stochastic evaluation of soil contamination and human health risks of potentially toxic elements in Nangodi, northern Ghana

Abstract

Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining (ASM) is a critical driver of soil contamination in West Africa, yet quantifying the relative contributions of natural and anthropogenic sources remains a major challenge. This study presents an integrated framework combining contamination indices, receptor modelling, and Machine Learning (ML) to evaluate Potentially Toxic Element (PTE) dynamics in soils from the Nangodi area, northern Ghana. A total of 552 grid-based soil samples were analysed for Cr, Co, Cu, Pb, V, and Zn using ED-XRF. Descriptive statistics revealed highly skewed distributions and elevated coefficients of variation for Cr, Co, and Cu, reflecting heterogeneous contamination patterns typical of ASM terrains. Pollution indices indicated divergent outcomes: the ecological Risk Index (RI) classified all samples as low risk (RI < 150), whereas the Nemerow Integrated Pollution Index (NIPI) identified 35.5% of samples as heavily polluted (NIPI ≥ 3). Positive Matrix Factorisation (PMF) resolved three distinct sources: a Cr–V lithogenic factor (51.7%), a Cu–Co–V assemblage reflecting mixed geogenic–agricultural influences (40.0%), and a Pb–Zn anthropogenic factor linked to ASM activities (8.3%). ML models (Artificial Neural Network and XGBoost) achieved high predictive accuracy (R² = 0.82–0.99), validating PMF factors and identifying Pb, Cu, and Cr as dominant predictors across source profiles. The integration of receptor and machine learning models provided both explanatory and predictive capacity, advancing current approaches to soil contamination assessment.

Research topics

  • Heavy metals in environment
  • Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s44378-026-00229-6

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.