article · Oxford Open Materials Science
Abstract This study provides a comprehensive examination of the structural, electronic, optical, and reactivity properties of ureidopeptidomimetics (UPMs) featuring various donor and acceptor functional groups using density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT). To systematically explore their effects on charge transfer, HOMO-LUMO energy gaps, and molecular stability, the molecular models were intentionally designed with both electron-donating groups (–CH3, –OCH3, –OH, –NH2) and electron-accepting groups (–SH, –COCl, –CF3). A detailed analysis of the bond lengths confirmed the electron-rich nature of the substituents, revealing that the introduction of electron-donating groups at the ureido and carboxylate terminals of the UPMs decreased the C–O and C–N bond lengths by 0.005 Å and 0.0003 Å, respectively, compared to the unsubstituted UPM. Polar solvents, notably water and DMSO, enhance the stabilization of HOMO and LUMO energy levels, thus improving the electronic stability and reactivity of UPM molecules, as demonstrated by DFT and TD-DFT calculations. In the case of UPM, the molecular orbitals (HOMO: −6.8646 eV to −6.9027 eV, LUMO: −0.3957 eV to −0.4248 eV) experienced slight stabilization as it transitioned from the gas phase to the aqueous phase. This transition increased the chemical potential (χ) and global hardness (η), signifying enhanced electronic stability. UV-Vis experiments revealed that UPM's λmax values remained around 218.6 nm across various solvents, with polar solvents, particularly water, exhibiting more robust oscillators. In water, λmax decreased to 207.58 nm for D2-UPM-A2 and shifted to 227.86 nm for D1-UPM-A1. For D3-UPM-A3, λmax in water exhibited a redshift to 249.28 nm along with reduced absorption. Specifically, for A1-UPM-D1 and A2-UPM-D2, the polarity of the solvent influenced transitions and increased transition probabilities, indicating their potential in optoelectronic applications.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1093/oxfmat/itaf001
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.