MARATTO

article · Journal of Cybersecurity Education Research and Practice

Software-Defined Networking powered by AI-driven Anomaly Detection

Abstract

Software Defined Networking (SDN) revolutionizes network control by separating the control plane from the data plane. Although the latter improves SDN agility and scalability, it creates a security hole, particularly in a central control plane, leading to SDN environments becoming high-profile targets for advanced cybersecurity threats. Due to static and signature-based point-in-time behavior, traditional security methods are unable to keep up with modern attacks that are an anomaly to SDNs. Artificial Intelligence (AI) with its different applications and techniques, has the capability of detecting SDN cyber threats’ anomalies. This paper presents the results of a literature scoping exercise that used a total of 54 papers that looked at AI-driven anomaly detection in SDN. The findings showed that control theory, activity theory, and anomaly detection theory are three theoretical aspects that contribute to the topic of AI-driven anomaly detection in SDN. Furthermore, different machine learning algorithms give different results. In this regard, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Multi-Layer Perceptron would help in detecting threats of a familiar nature, while autoencoders and K-means can detect unfamiliar threats. While deep learning architectures such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) support low-latency anomaly detection while maintaining throughput and network stability. The findings could be the basis of providing a conceptual framework on how an intelligent, adaptive, and resilient SDN with real-time threat defense mechanisms could be designed, developed, and deployed.

Research topics

  • Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.62915/2472-2707.1251

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.