article · Frontiers in Environmental Science
Introduction This study examines smallholder farmer readiness for sustainable land management (SLM) under the Global Environment Facility (GEF7) project in semi-arid Limpopo Province, South Africa. Methods Using a mixed-methods approach combining farmer profiling survey, key informant interviews, field observations, and community mapping, we assessed 48 farmers (79.2% female, 37.5% youth) across four readiness dimensions: cognitive, behavioural, structural, and motivational. Results Farming was predominantly rainfed and subsistence-oriented, with most households cultivating <1 ha. Most farmers (85.4%) reported land degradation indicators, primarily soil erosion (54.2%) and declining fertility (52.1%). Climate risks (drought, poor rainfall, heat stress) were identified by 85% of participants, yet access to climate information services was limited. Although 93.8% of farmers had implemented at least one SLM practice, adoption concentrated on low-cost options (manure/compost = 60.4%; crop rotation = 35.4%; agroforestry = 35.4%), while intensive practices such as contouring and controlled grazing remained rare (6.2%). Structural readiness was the primary limitation, i.e. extension access was infrequent (33.3% never accessed), only 35.4% had received SLM training, and collective action mechanisms were absent. Critically, all farmers expressed willingness to adopt improved practices if supported through training, demonstrations, and follow-up. Fisher's Exact Test revealed significant associations between extension access and adoption of agroforestry (p = 0.004) and mulching (p = 0.002). Conclusion We conclude that farmer readiness is high in cognitive and motivational dimensions but constrained by structural deficits. Interventions must prioritize strengthening extension systems, practical training, and community-level coordination to unlock existing readiness and scale SLM in semi-arid communal landscapes.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2026.1872864
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.