article · International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
INTRODUCTION: Sigmoid-rectal intussusception or invagination is an infrequently documented condition in the adult population, with only a handful of cases reported in the medical literature. The underlying pathological mechanism involves impaired peristalsis, often attributed to a malignant tumor. CASE PRESENTATION: A 78-year-old patient, with a history of abdominal pain and lower gastrointestinal bleeding, sought care at our emergency department with evident symptoms indicative of large bowel obstruction. Abdominal examination revealed distension and rectal examination found a mass mimicking an internal rectal prolapse. Subsequently, imaging studies confirmed the diagnosis of sigmoid-rectal intussusception. The patient underwent an emergency open sigmoid resection with Hartman's procedure. The postoperative course was uneventful. Anatomopathological analysis revealed the presence of stage I adenocarcinoma. A restoration of digestive continuity was scheduled six months later. One-year follow-up assessments showed no indications of local recurrence or distant metastasis. DISCUSSION: Sigmoid rectal intussusception stands as a unique and infrequently reported medical entity. The absence of distinct clinical symptoms often renders diagnosis a challenging task, with confirmation typically relying on radiological findings. In contrast to the non-surgical approaches employed in pediatric cases, intussusception in adults necessitates surgical intervention due to its predominantly malignant underpinnings. CONCLUSION: While sigmoid-rectal intussusception is an exceedingly rare occurrence, its manifestation with a multitude of non-specific symptoms can complicate clinical recognition. Nevertheless, it should be duly considered as a potential etiological factor in cases of large bowel obstruction, particularly when suggestive signs are found on rectal examination.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.109018
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.